Take Off My Aviation Era - Chapter 1735

With just such a short sentence, some places have broken the defenses. Your US defense supplier has limited production capacity. What should we do?

Take the old third-generation machine that has been in service for more than 20 years to smash with the fourth-generation machine?

Isn’t that looking for abuse!

What’s more, the domestic naval forces are more than just this fourth-generation aircraft. The Type 075 amphibious assault ship that has just entered service is also equipped with 8 FC-25 vertical take-off and landing carrier-based fighters.

The overall performance is not much worse than that of the American-made F-35B.

More importantly, the task division of the FC-25 vertical take-off and landing carrier-based fighter is more reasonable and clear than that of the F-35B, which is to provide close air fire support for the Marine Corps in landing operations.

For this reason, the FC-25 vertical take-off and landing carrier-based fighter does not emphasize the ability of vertical take-off, but uses it more as an auxiliary function for short-range take-off, that is, short-range take-off and vertical landing, so as to increase the amount of bombs and While expanding the combat radius, expand the scope of application of the carrier-based aircraft.

Of course, the number of 8 aircraft is only to meet the amphibious combat needs of the amphibious assault ship. After all, in addition to the 8 FC-25 carrier fighters, there are 12 Zhi-20 medium helicopters and 12 Zhi-8plus heavy helicopters and 8 Zhi-10D shipborne armed helicopter.

With two air-cushion landing crafts, it can carry a fully loaded reinforced battalion to implement a triad of rapid landing operations against the predetermined probes.

This can be regarded as the general combat mode of the Type 075 amphibious assault ship. It is a little more special. You can install a set of 14-degree skid deck modules to the bow, and then equip with 26 FC-25 carrier fighters and 4 straight The Zhi-18 early warning helicopter modified by the 8plus heavy helicopter has become a small aircraft carrier.

Although the comprehensive combat capability of such an aircraft carrier is not comparable to that of a large aircraft carrier such as the S, it is still an existence that cannot be underestimated in the surrounding area, and its daily deterrence and display strength are completely sufficient.

Even in wartime, it can also cooperate with large aircraft carriers such as the L and S to form a large multi-carrier task force to enhance its continuous combat capability.

The navy has already equipped four such amphibious assault ships.

In addition to the two large aircraft carriers previously equipped, the number of carrier-based aircraft combined with the two large and four small aircraft reached 202, of which 100 were fourth-generation fighters.

Regardless of scale or quality, let alone in Asia, it is one of the best in the world. It is strange that some snobbish snobberies are not flustered.

Of course, compared to the fourth-generation aircraft, what makes this group of people more disturbed is the dominance of China Ascendas in drones.

Especially in the series of plans announced by China Ascendas in recent years, these people have keenly discovered that China Ascendas has not only made UAVs as popular as possible, but also made them completely like ordinary artillery shells. Of cabbage.

Yes, China Ascendas really uses drones as cannonballs.

It is about to integrate small attack drones such as cruise missiles into the launching tube of similar multiple rocket launchers. The precise position of the target does not need to be considered during the operation. It is only dropped in the general direction, and then the ability of these drones to cruise in long voyages is used. Cruise in the sky, and launch a fierce attack from top to bottom after the target is determined.

This set of technical architecture has been proposed as early as the early 1990s. As far as the technology itself is concerned, it is not complicated, so that a second- and third-rate regional power such as Turkey can easily control it.

But if you want to achieve such an unreliable, uncontrollable, and ultra-large-scale application like China’s Ascendas, you can search all over the world, except for the United States.

Because the key here is not in the drone technology itself, but in the space orbit outside the atmosphere.

The reason for this is that communication satellites all over the low-Earth orbit space are the root of all this.

It’s not that no one knew this before, but because of limited space orbits, communication satellites not only have high production costs and higher launch costs, plus the scarcity of communication frequency bands, only limited resources can be given to “predators” or Large UAVs such as the Global Hawk, small and medium UAVs can only be temporarily abandoned.

However, with the continuous upgrading and improvement of China’s take-off “Roaming Terminator” program, the problem of communication guidance for small and medium-sized drones has now been completely solved.

We must know that it is already the third generation of “Roaming Terminator” constellation satellites. Today, more than 8,000 small satellites have been deployed in low-Earth orbit space, and the number will further increase to 40,000 in the future.

This is equivalent to weaving a super-large satellite communication network in the low-Earth orbit space, which can not only meet the needs of remote control of small and medium-sized drones, but also provide mobile Internet communication services. Of course, you can also receive some thoughts in the end. What is the cost of orbit transfer for launching satellite entities?

It can be said to be a big deal with multiple birds.

Therefore, many powerful companies have been attracted to join it, but in the end, except for Zhuang Jianye’s take-off system, Musk’s SpaceX, one of the others can be regarded as death or injury.

No way, this thing needs low-cost launch technology to support it in order to play. UU reading www.uukanshu.com

Regardless of the low cost, the investment in the early stage is actually not small. This is the same as the minimalist decoration. It looks mediocre and has no characteristics. In fact, the craftsmanship details are the most elegant, and the same is also costly.

The same is true for low-cost launch technology. Without the continuous investment of major powers for decades, such great companies as Ascendas and SpaceX would have been long gone.

Of course, the two low-cost launch technologies can be described as reaching the same goal by different routes. Both the Ascendas and SpaceX adopt rocket reusable technology, continuously refurbishing second-hand and third-hand rockets to achieve the goal of repeatedly reducing costs.

Although there is little difference between the two technical paths in low-Earth orbit, Zhuang Jianye even used the “Diamond Monkey” 2F carrier rocket to launch a new TM-9MAX small single-engine high-level business jet into high orbit; Musk was immediately unwilling to do so. The one showing weakness shot a Tesla electric car into space.

Don’t mean it should be intense.

But in terms of deep space exploration, the two paths are completely different. Musk favors the conquest of Mars and has made a huge plan for this, while Zhuang Jianye is working step by step, preparing to establish a base on the moon first, and then proceed further. Deep space exploration.

Because of this, the development focus of the two companies has become very different. Musk focuses on the research of super large rockets and Mars shuttle technology, and hopes that he can scatter his ashes on Mars after his death.

On the other hand, Zhuang Jianye focuses on the space station, the combination of large-scale extraterrestrial artificial celestial bodies, and moon exploration. He has not only invested heavily in the construction of the space station, but also actively developed innovative technology development that is conducive to the long-term survival of life bodies.